Superior Linkbuilding: How to Find the Absolute Best Marketers and Writers to Pitch

In my final post , I explained just how using network visualization tools can assist you massively improve your content marketing PR/Outreach strategy — understanding which information outlets have the largest syndication systems empowers your outreach team in order to prioritize high-syndication publications over cheaper syndication publications. The result? The content you might be pitching enjoys significantly more widespread hyperlink pickups.

Today, I’ m going to take you a small deeper — we’ll be looking at a couple of techniques for forming an even better knowledge of the publisher syndication networks within your particular niche.   I’ve damaged this technique into two parts:

  • Technique One — Leveraging Buzzsumo influencer data plus twitter scraping to find the most important journalists writing about any topic
  • Technique Two — Using the Gdelt Dataset to expose deep story syndication networks in between publishers using in-context links.

Why do this whatsoever?

If you are interested in producing high-value links at scale, these types of techniques provide an undeniable competitive benefit —   they help you to seriously understand how writers and news journals connect and syndicate to each other.

In our opinion at Fractl , data-driven content stories that have strong information hooks, finding writers and guides who would find the content compelling, plus pitching them effectively is the solitary highest ROI SEO activity probable. Done correctly, it is entirely possible to create dozens, sometimes even hundreds or even thousands, of high-authority links along with one or a handful of content campaigns.

Let’s dive in.

Using Buzzsumo to understand reporter influencer networks on any subject

First, you want to determine who your topc influencers are usually your a topic. A very handy function of Buzzsumo is its “ influencers” tool. You can locate this on the influences tab, then stick to these steps:

  • Choose only “ Journalists. ” This can limit the result to only the Tweets accounts of those known to be reporters plus journalists of major publications. Blog owners and lower authority publishers is going to be excluded.
  • Search utilizing a topical keyword. If it is straightforward, 1 or 2 searches should be fine. If it is more complicated, create a few related queries, plus collate the twitter accounts that will appear in all of them. Alternatively, use the Boolean “and/or” in your search to filter your result. It is critical to be sure your results are returning journalists that because closely match your target requirements as possible.
  • Ideally, you need at least 100 results. More is normally better, so long as you are sure the outcomes represent your target criteria properly.
  • Once you are happy with your result, click export to grab the CSV.

The next step is to grab all the people each of these known journalist influencers follows — the goal would be to understand which of these 100 roughly influencers impacts the other 100 probably the most. Additionally , we want to find people beyond this group that many of these one hundred follow in common.

To do this, we leveraged Twint , a handy Tweets scraper available on Github to pull all the people each of these journalist influencers stick to.   Using our scraped information, we built an  edge checklist, which allowed us to imagine the result in  Gephi .

The following is an interactive version for you to discover, and here is a screenshot of what looks like:

This graph shows all of us which nodes (influencers) have the majority of In-Degree links. In other words: it lets us know who, of our media influencers, is usually most followed.  

These are the top 10 nodes:

  • Maia Szalavitz (@maiasz) Neuroscience Journalist, VICE and PERIOD
  • Radley Balko (@radleybalko) Opinion journalist, Washington Post
  • Johann Hari (@johannhari101) Ny Times best-selling author
  • David Kroll (@davidkroll) Freelance health care writer, Forbes Heath
  • Max Daly (@Narcomania) Global Medicines Editor, VICE
  • Dana Milbank (@milbank)Columnist, Washington Post
  • Sam Quinones (@samquinones7), Writer
  • Felice Freyer (@felicejfreyer), Boston Globe Reporter, Mental health insurance and Addiction
  • Jeanne Whalen (@jeannewhalen) Business Reporter, Washington Article
  • Eric Bolling (@ericbolling) New York Times best-selling author

Who is the most important?

Using the “ Betweenness Centrality” score given by Gephi, we all get a rough understanding of which nodes (influencers) in the network act as hubs of information transfer. Those with the highest “Betweenness Centrality” can be thought of as the “ connectors” of the network. These are the very best 10 influencers:

  • Maia Szalavitz (@maiasz) Neuroscience Journalist, VICE and TIME
  • David Kroll (@davidkroll) Freelance healthcare writer, Forbes Heath
  • Jeanne Whalen (@jeannewhalen) Business Media reporter, Washington Post
  • Travis Lupick (@tlupick),   Journalist, Author
  • Johann Hari (@johannhari101) Nyc Times best-selling author
  • Radley Balko (@radleybalko) Opinion journalist, Washington Post
  • Sam Quinones (@samquinones7), Author
  • Eric Bolling (@ericbolling) Nyc Times best-selling author
  • Dana Milbank (@milbank)Columnist, Washington Post
  • Mike Riggs (@mikeriggs) Article writer & Editor, Reason Mag 

@maiasz, @davidkroll, plus @johannhari101 are standouts. There’s significant overlap between the winners in “In-Degree” and “Betweenness Centrality” but they continue to be quite different.  

What else can we find out?

The middle of the creation holds many of the largest sized nodes. The nodes in this view are usually sized by “In-Degree. ” The top, centrally located nodes are disproportionately then other members of the graph and revel in popularity across the board (from most of the other influential nodes). These are media commonly followed by everyone else. Sifting by means of these centrally located nodes will surface area many journalists who behave as influencers of the group initially pulled from BuzzSumo.

So , if you a new campaign about a niche topic, you can consider pitching to an influencer come up from this data — according to the visualization, an article shared within their network would have the most reach plus potential ROI

Using Gdelt to find the most important websites on a topic with in-context link analysis

The very first example was a great way to find the best media in a niche to pitch in order to, but top journalists are often one of the most pitched to overall. Often times, it could be easier to get a pickup from much less known writers at major magazines. For this reason, understanding which major web publishers are most influential, and enjoy the particular widest syndication on a specific concept, topic, or beat, can be majorly helpful.

By using Gdelt’ s massive and fully extensive database of digital news tales, along with Google BigQuery and Gephi, it is possible to dig even deeper in order to yield important strategic information that will assist you prioritize your content pitching.

We pulled all of the articles within Gdelt’ s database that are considered to be about a specific theme within a provided timeframe. In this case (as with the prior example) we looked at “behaviour wellness. ” For each article we present in Gdelt’ s database that fits our criteria, we also snapped up links found only within the framework of the article.

This is how it is done:

  • Connect to Gdelt on Google BigQuery — you can find a tutorial here .
  • Pull data from Gdelt.   You can use this command: SELECT DocumentIdentifier, V2Themes, Extras, SourceCommonName, DATE THROUGH [gdelt-bq:gdeltv2.gkg] where (V2Themes like ‘%Your Theme%’).
  • Select any theme you find, here — just replace the component between the percentages.
  • To extract the links present in each article and build an advantage file. This can be done with a relatively easy python script to pull out all the < PAGE_LINKS> from the results of the particular query, clean the links to only display their root domain (not the entire URL) and put them into an advantage file format.

Note: The edge file is made up of Source–> Target pairs. The Source is the write-up and the Target are the links throughout the article. The edge list will look like this particular:

  • Article one, First link found in the article.
  • Article 1, Second hyperlink found in the article.
  • Write-up 2, First link found in the content.
  • Article 2, 2nd link found in the article.
  • Article 2, Third link present in the article.

From this level, the edge file can be used to build a system visualization where the nodes publishers  as well as the edges between them represent the in-context links found from our Gdelt information pull around whatever topic all of us desired.

This last visualization is a network representation from the publishers who have written stories regarding addiction, and where those tales link to.

What can we learn from this chart?

This tells us which usually nodes (Publisher websites) have the many In-Degree links. In other words: who is probably the most linked. We can see that the most linked-to for this topic are:

  • tmz. com
  • people. com
  • cdc. gov
  • cnn. possuindo
  • go. com
  • nih. gov
  • ap. org
  • latimes. com
  • jamanetwork. possuindo
  • nytimes. com

Which publisher is certainly most influential?  

Using the “Betweenness Centrality” score provided by Gephi, we get a rough knowledge of which nodes (publishers) in the system act as hubs of information transfer. The particular nodes with the highest “Betweenness Centrality” can be thought of as the “connectors” from the network. Getting pickups from these high-betweenness centrality nodes gives a much higher likelihood of syndication for that specific topic/theme.  

  • Dailymail. co. uk
  • Nytimes. com
  • Individuals. com
  • CNN. possuindo
  • Latimes. com
  • washingtonpost. com
  • usatoday. com
  • cvslocal. com
  • huffingtonpost. possuindo
  • sfgate. com

What else may we learn?

Exactly like the first example, the higher the betweenness centrality numbers, number of In-degree hyperlinks, and the more centrally located in the chart, the more “ important” that client can generally be said to be. Applying this as a guide, the most important pitching focuses on can be easily identified.  

Understanding some of the edge groupings gives additional insights into some other potential opportunities. Including a few groupings specific to different regional or condition local news, and a few foreign language syndication clusters.

Wrapping up

I’ ve outlined 2 different techniques we use in Fractl to understand the influence systems around specific topical areas, in terms of publications and the authors at those publications. The creation techniques described are not obvious manuals, but instead, are tools for brushing through large amounts of data plus finding hidden information. Use these types of techniques to unearth new opportunities plus prioritize as you get ready to find the best areas to pitch the content you’ ve worked so hard to create.

Do you have any similar ideas or even tactics to ensure you’re pitching the very best writers and publishers with your content material? Comment below!

If you liked Superior Linkbuilding: How to Find the Absolute Best Marketers and Writers to Pitch by Then you'll love Miami SEO Expert

Shares